Articles

Christ or Aristotle: Where did this book come from?

Christ or Aristotle: Where did this book come from?


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Christ or Aristotle: Where did this book come from?

By Cameron Lindley Cross

Undergraduate Paper, 2004

Introduction: Although easily dismissed for its casual attention to detail, poor scholarship, and flair for the fantastic, the medieval bestiary offers a wealth of information – not, perhaps, about animals themselves, but about the people who wrote about them. A critical examination of a bestiary, with special attention to the order of the catalogue and the kind of details that were recorded, can return a vivid image of the medieval European cosmology, shedding light on how Europeans distinguished themselves from animals, whether they believed animals were a positive or negative aspect of their world, and similar issues. It can provide insight on the evolution of Christianity, a factor that cannot be given too much importance in the medieval world.

Upon first reading, the bestiary comes across as hopelessly disorganized, as if the author chose his animals and penned the words as they entered his head. The common and exotic, the real and fictional all intermingle haphazardly, with entries jumping from felines to equines to enormous mammals to small ones without any discernable division. However, it is possible to identify certain patterns which may explain how the author viewed the animal kingdom. Firstly, I would say that the author moves from what we might have deemed the ‘great beasts’ to the humbler, the more mundane. Lions, tigers, and panthers were the socially accepted kings of the animal world, antelopes were the swiftest of beasts, and unicorns, lynxes, and griffons were all distinguished by their nobility, power, or savagery. In fact, all of the animals in the first section of the bestiary (until the sermon after number 28) possessed unusual (or, in our modern view, supernatural) characteristics. The elephant has no desire to copulate and does so facing away from his mate for shame; the bear gives birth to a formless mass that she then gives form with her tongue; even the local wolf possesses a patch of aphrodisiac hair on its backside.


Watch the video: Aristotles Ethics and Politics: Happiness, Reason and the Ideal Society by Leonard Peikoff (May 2022).


Comments:

  1. Sruthan

    I think they are wrong. Let us try to discuss this.

  2. Willmar

    looked ... VERY COOL! I advise everyone ..

  3. Tabar

    Excuse for that I interfere... here recently. But this theme is very close to me. Is ready to help.

  4. Lance

    I'm sorry, but in my opinion, you are wrong. Let us try to discuss this. Write to me in PM.

  5. Bryan

    The success of any website on the Internet lies in its daily renewal. In your case, it is simply necessary, only then you will have regular visitors. It's the same as in a car, you need to constantly add gasoline to the gas tank, then the car will be in motion. I am writing this for a reason, I am writing as a person who also has his own website.



Write a message